Maga gay

Trump-loving LGBT conservatives say they are marching to the tune of their own drum after finding themselves ostracized by the increasingly left leaning gay rights movement. Gay MAGA is hypermasculine and anti-woke—and it wants a break from the LGBTQ+ movement. Rob Smith, a Black gay Iraq War veteran, is on the Trump Pride board.

He became active in Republican politics after the Pulse massacre, drawn to Trump's hard line against terrorism. Between Black MAGA supporters realizing their party is actually racist, gay Trump voters being disappointed when the queer community wants nothing to do with them, and people waking up to the. Who is John Reid, the gay MAGA Republican that Virginia’s GOP governor wants off the statewide ballot?

Gays for trump

The Republican says the GOP is targeting him because he's gay. He's comparing himself to. Overall Response Courts. One of the most extreme positions included in Project is the use of criminal laws to punish gender nonconformity in public life: Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology … has no claim to First Amendment protection … Pornography should be outlawed.

Mobilizing public support on behalf of vulnerable children and youth — as the ACLU did in the context of family separation — will help deter further draconian policies and can help reshape the political narrative around transgender justice. A second Trump administration would attempt to halt gender-affirming medical care for adolescents nationwide by threatening to deny Medicaid funding for hospitals that provide that care, asserting — against the recommendations of all major medical associations — that it does not meet federal health and safety standards.

House of Representatives. Third — and most ominously — if Trump returns to the White House, we expect him to try to weaponize federal law against transgender people across the country. Source: American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU is laying groundwork to amplify and capitalize on such moments to create political backlash that forces the administration to reconsider.

In addition, borrowing from lessons learned from the struggle to maintain access to abortion care, we will advocate for states to create reliable, permanent funding streams to ensure that those who would otherwise be cut off from gender-affirming medical care due to the exclusion of such care from federal programs are still able to access care under state programs. The ACLU has already brought multiple cases challenging state-law bans on gender-affirming medical care for minors and would continue to litigate this issue in courts across the country should a second Trump administration further restrict this care for adolescents.

And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered. This would strip LGBTQ people of nondiscrimination guarantees across a vast swath of federal government programs including Social Security, Medicare, and housing programs, as well as federal government employment. Throughout this political onslaught, the ACLU, our nationwide affiliate network, and our millions of members have remained stalwart in defense of the basic principle that all people deserve the freedom to be themselves and every state should be a safe place to raise every family.

The ACLU has litigated against claims that the First Amendment entitles businesses that are open to the public to discriminate against LGBTQ people, and would similarly oppose such arguments asserted by employers. He plans to use federal laws — including laws meant to safeguard civil rights — as a cudgel to override critical state-level protections, arguing that state laws that protect transgender students violate the federal statutory rights of non-transgender students.

HRC has had year-round, on-the-ground staff in these states since , and will bring on dozens of additional staffers in these states to organize for November.

However, states can and should lay down clear markers that their own laws and constitutions require protection of transgender people both to provide practical protections at least for a time and to create the opportunity for political organizing and mobilization when and if the Trump administration tries to override those state protections. And transgender people could face these criminal penalties for merely being themselves in public.

We would also argue that states should have the freedom to create greater civil rights protections for groups they believe face discrimination — such as transgender youth and adults — and that federal civil rights laws should not be interpreted to overrule those state protections. This would push out many active-duty transgender servicemembers who have served with distinction and would bar new transgender recruits from enlisting.

Transgender Survey found they faced higher rates of poverty and homelessness than their cisgender peers, and data from the Human Rights Campaign found a persistent wage gap between transgender and cisgender people. Such discrimination should be subjected to heightened equal protection scrutiny, since the Supreme Court has recognized in Bostock that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is discrimination based on sex, which is unconstitutional unless the government can prove that the discrimination is substantially related to an important government interest.

Donate to the ACLU. By enacting policies supporting a religious right to be exempt from workplace nondiscrimination laws, a second Trump administration could create uncertainty about the enforceability of nondiscrimination laws against those who have religious objections to LGBTQ people. Everything is at stake and the contrast could not be clearer. Categorically denying such health care would violate the Constitution and section of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in health care programs.

We will engage on every advocacy front, including mobilizing and organizing our network of millions of ACLU members and activists in every state to work to protect LGBTQ people from the dangerous policies of a second Trump administration. To the contrary, the court has rejected such claims in the past, although it is not clear how the Supreme Court would rule on this issue now.